Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Throw vs Throw Ex

Just for demonstrating, if you have classes in C# as follows,

using System;
namespace WindowsApplication1 {
public class Class1 {
public static void DoSomething() {
try { Class2.DoSomething(); } catch(Exception ex) { throw ex; }
}}

public class Class2 {
public static void DoSomething() {
try { Class3.DoSomething(); } catch(Exception ex) { throw ex; }
}}

public class Class3 {
public static void DoSomething() {
try { int divider=0; int number=5/divider; } catch(Exception ex) { throw ex; }
}}}

And you call,

Class1.DoSomething();

What's the difference if you rethrow the exception using plain 'throw;' or 'throw ex;'?

Answer:

If you use "throw ex;", The stack trace is something like,

System.DivideByZeroException: Attempted to divide by zero.
at WindowsApplication1.Class1.DoSomething() in C:\WindowsApplication1\main.cs:line 15
at WindowsApplication1.Form1.button1_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\WindowsApplication1\Form1.cs:line 103

But if you use just 'throw' instead of 'throw ex' to rethrow the same exception, that is,

public class Class3 {
public static void DoSomething() {
try { int divider=0; int number=5/divider; } catch { throw ; }
}}

And of course for all rethrow statements, the stack trace is now like,

System.DivideByZeroException: Attempted to divide by zero.
at WindowsApplication1.Class3.DoSomething() in C:\WindowsApplication1\Main.cs:line 46
at WindowsApplication1.Class2.DoSomething() in C:\WindowsApplication1\Main.cs:line 30
at WindowsApplication1.Class1.DoSomething() in C:\WindowsApplication1\Main.cs:line 15
at WindowsApplication1.Form1.button1_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\WindowsApplication1\Form1.cs:line 103

See the difference? BTW, This concerns both C# and VB. VB docs state that in "Throw expression" the expression would be required. This is not completely true, you can use just "Throw" in VB to rethrow the same exception. C# docs do tell that in "throw expression" the expression "is omitted when rethrowing the current exception object in a catch clause".